| Hello johan nine Total Points 497 Level 2 |
Categories
Your Open Question
Choose a best answer q
|
Member since: February 05, 2007
Total points: 497 (Level 2)
Points earned this week: --%Best answer
|
Who has the most faith,creationists/evolut...creationists trusting faith in god 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago 1 second ago You can't answer your own question. |
|
| |








the high court ruled using a sniffer dog was the same as a policeman using a torch
Posted by on 16th Jan 07 at 1:18 ammy reply is where does the policeman turn it on after or before he has reasonable doudt?
clearly a dog is a policeman who is using illegal and invasive search empowermeant ,training dogs to sniff for drugs and not childmolesters nor terrorists is discrimatry.
further the laws are unconstitutional ,no part of any state or federal constitution ,allows for the charging of a plant [while inground legally a fixture] to be classed as a drug ,let alone by the lie of deening by act and scedual a plant to be a salt [drug] extract
nor to charge and imprison any personal drug use ,by deeming a plant a fungable ie a tradable commodity sans proof it was for sale.
no other activity has been declared war upon ,also that war on its own citisenry is unconstitutional ,noting child molestation ,murder ,rape theft fraud and other public dangers not having war delared upon them being discrimination
that taxonomical id is inconsistant to dna ,that cannabis sativa l is only a type of cannabis ,specificlly aimed by dupont and hurst mews papers at removing a buisness competitor for fibre and rope /paper makket restriction of trade.