Sign In
New User? Sign Up
ClimateChangeAction · Climate Change Action Group
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!7

Yahoo!7 Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can schedule a time for the group to chat.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Reports of GP-SE Asia about climate change, nuclear energy and clean   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #155 of 3305 |
Re: Reports of GP-SE Asia about climate change, nuclear energy and clean solutions.

Thanks a lot, Kim, for the right phraseology.

So, there are "signatures" of Kyoto from both countries, but there
is NO "ratification" by both of them.

Friendly greetings from

Rob.
----------------------------------

--- In ClimateChangeAction@..., kim <kkaos@r...>
wrote:
> hi rob,
>
> i think you might be bit confused - US and Aust have both signed
> the kyoto protocol, neither have ratified it which means they have
> not given it any power.
>
> regards,
>
> kim
> -------------------------------------------
> Rob wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please read the very clear and important reports from
GreenPeace -
> > South East Asia, about climate change, renewable energy and
> > why "nuclear power is NO solution for clean energy".
> >
> > IMHO, we must talk and ACT about cutting on greenhouse gasses but
> > ALSO say "NO" to nuclear energy. Both are more than just related,
> > because many governments and the nuclear lobby will do all they
can
> > so everyone accepts the idea that nuclear energy is the only
clean
> > energy to reach the goals of the Kyoto Protocol. And that is a
lie
> > according to the GP reports. The ONLY CLEAN solution is to use
> > renewable energy at a very big scale to become a healthy and
clean
> > world for now, for the coming years and many centuries.
> >
> > As I wrote before, only Australia has still to ratify the Kyoto
> > Protocol because Pres. G.W. Bush of the US didn't UNSIGN the
Kyoto
> > signature of Bill Clinton. Countries as India, China and others,
> > have no obligation to follow the schedules of Kyoto because they
> > are "countries in development. I just did read that somewhere on
the
> > internet, so, please, if I am wrong, I should be happy to see
some
> > reference with other statements. How we could convince J. Howard
to
> > abandon "dirty" coal energy and not using nuclear in the future
will
> > be very difficult. Australia has much coal in his soil and is,
with
> > Canada, the biggest producer of uranium. So, why should the J.
> > Howard government in power invest billions of dollars in
renewable
> > energy?
> >
> > Rob.
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > You can find the reports at:
> > http://www.greenpeace.org/seasia/en/asia-energy-revolution/
> > And click on "Dirty energy" on the left of the Home Page.
> > Also the items "Climate change" and "Solutions" are important to
> > read.
> > Another website about solar energy can be found at:
> > http://en.solargeneration.de/






Sun Dec 4, 2005 2:02 am

rderoyan
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #155 of 3305 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hi all, Please read the very clear and important reports from GreenPeace - South East Asia, about climate change, renewable energy and why "nuclear power is NO...
Rob
rderoyan
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2005
5:07 pm

hi rob, i think you might be bit confused - US and Aust have both signed the kyoto protocol, neither have ratified it which means they have not given it any...
kim
foodirradiat...
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2005
9:55 pm

Thanks a lot, Kim, for the right phraseology. So, there are "signatures" of Kyoto from both countries, but there is NO "ratification" by both of them. Friendly...
Rob
rderoyan
Offline Send Email
Dec 4, 2005
2:03 am

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Australia & NZ Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help