Dear John,
Never give up hope on our species. Just get published!
We are an intelligent lot.
as well you know!
Great bunch of survivors too :-)
Just need to be clearly informed when making big decisions like
forming an opinion and looking for viable options and solutions to big
problems.
The tide is with us now.
I see the road to the goal posts so brilliantly, just need to sink the
ball.
Warmest regards
Anne
--- In ClimateChangeAction@..., "John Hill"
<wynhill@...> wrote:
>
> Dear All:
>
> Shouldn't we be seriously protesting the announcement that the Qld.
govt. is adding another $650 million to the $113 million it already
promised in July to provide additional rail facilities for the coal
industry?
>
> For details, click on;
http://abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/10/10/2056182.htm?section=business
>
> Shouldn't there be proper public discussion about such huge
subsidies out of the public purse to support very dirty private
businesses?
>
> Imagine what we could do to provide green power in this state with
$763 million dollars? And imagine how much carbon would remain
sequestered if it was not dug out of the ground and then transported
to be burnt?
>
> Surely, if this obscene misuse of our public funds was explained
clearly to the electorate there would be a huge outcry. Seeing as a
federal election is just around the corner - I think we should be
shouting from the rooftops! Maybe we could then embarrass Federal
Labor into leaning on the State govt. to really promote some serious
action to prevent global warming and ecological collapse!
>
> Please - any comments on how we could make this a live issue would
be most welcome.
>
> I live in hope (miniscule as it is),
>
> John Hill
>
> ...............................................
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Anne Goddard
> To: Group 1 ; GreenLeft_Discussion@yahoogroups.com ;
green-activist@...
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 1:27 PM
> Subject: [ClimateChangeAction] Dirty polices and practices
>
>
> Beware of "missing words" when perusing political party's policies
and
> deciding where you will be casting your PRECIOUS 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th
> votes....
>
> If, like me, you wish to see an end to the nuclear industry
(firstly) on
> moral grounds, followed closely by environmental grounds, and
clearly not
> needed on financial grounds, then expanding the mining of Uranium in
> Australia is NOT wanted, needed or necessary.
>
> read more: http://globalclimatechangeaction.org
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>