Sign In
New User? Sign Up
ClimateChangeAction · Climate Change Action Group
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!7

Yahoo!7 Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can search the group for older messages.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
FW: Save the Mary River info   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #2680 of 3264 |
Re: [ClimateChangeAction] FW: Save the Mary River info



Recycling of grey water is a far far better option than de-salination -
most Australian cities now operate on a greater or lesser amount of
re-cycled water. The energy costs are far less than de-salination - The
Californian cities of LosAngeles Orange County (Irvine, Santa Anna, Tustin
etc) are now not only purifying the effluent (to a better standard than
drinking water - but they are pumping it back into the aquifers to
re-charge them). If they can do it - so can all Australian cities and
towns. (see - http:/www.discovermagazine.com 'better water' May 2008.

The 'Yuk' factor is a serious 'con' foisted by people who ought to know better.

De-salination requires very significant energy expenditures - which in our
regions are provided by coal burning power stations..global warming anyone??

go figure

Hugh.





>For those in SEQld. Rally to protest the proposed Traverston Crossing
>Dam. Fwd to your contacts. Information from the attached flyer:
>
>The Qld Labor Party is holding its State Convention at the Gold Coast
>Convention Centre on June 21,22. Kevin "I'm here to help" Rudd will be
>there.
>
>BACKGROUND INFORMATION
>
> * Brisbane and SEQ want (and are entitled to) the cheapest source of
> 100% reliable water.
> * The politicians must provide it in a way that is environmentally
> and economically responsible.
> * There is an overwhelming body of evidence that, along with present
> storages, the demand for water can be met from non-rainfall
> dependent methods such as desalination using renewable energy
> sources, combined with water saving methods such as storm water
> harvesting, recycling of waste water, responsible water usage from
> household and industry, and installation of water saving devices.
>
>
>A dam approved at Traveston Crossing, even with conditions, however
>strictly phrased or enforced, fails these requirements. It destroys
>productive farmland, unique animal species, fisheries, AND COSTS MORE!
>
>Just one desalination plant can provide the water that the Qld Govt say
>they will take from the Mary.

??????

It will cost less, it will be 100%
>reliable, and it will pose no threat to the Lungfish, Mary River Turtle,
>or to the rare and endangered species of the Great Sandy Straits.
>This plant can be powered from renewable energy sources. WA currently
>has a desal plant powered by a wind farm.
>
>Otherwise Qld converts this beautiful productive working river into the
>mess that is the Murray.

>This alternative is unthinkable. Why would you do it when it is not even
>necessary?
>
>





Wed May 28, 2008 10:52 am

battyhugh
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #2680 of 3264 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

For those in SEQld. Rally to protest the proposed Traverston Crossing Dam. Fwd to your contacts. Information from the attached flyer: The Qld Labor Party is...
Brooke Oehm Smith
novorivus
Offline Send Email
May 28, 2008
10:24 am

Recycling of grey water is a far far better option than de-salination - most Australian cities now operate on a greater or lesser amount of re-cycled water....
hugh spencer
battyhugh
Offline Send Email
May 28, 2008
10:48 am

Hi all, I thought this exchange might be of interest. It regards the call for a desal plant as part of the campaign to save the Mary River. My query was ...
Kamala Emanuel
kamala@...
Send Email
Jun 20, 2008
9:49 am

Hi - after reading Steve's reply - I stick by my original comments (see about 4 comments down)... having a situation where we are using potable water to flush...
hugh spencer
battyhugh
Offline Send Email
Jun 20, 2008
10:21 am

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Australia & NZ Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help