When the original posted message ends up all spread out over the
page, I like to redo-- would used email stripper to get the ">"
things out, but when message is this long, the email stripper
refuses, and I'm too lazy to break it up and repost in sections!--

=================
--- In FoodHerbHealth@..., Lee & Cindy
<leeandcindy@j...> wrote:
> FROTH & BUBBLE
>
> - Thirteen dead from contaminated water in Pakistan
> http://www.terradaily.com/2005/050630113730.3ohgw35u.html
>
> =================================
> 1 in 6 Nations Affected by...
>
> World Food Shortages
>
> Severe drought shortages this year are creating food shortages in
> one of every six nations worldwide. This according to a UN agency.
> Experts say that this cold become semi-permanent under global
> climate changes. Details here.
>
> ============================
> Latest US Mad Cow Disease Case
>
> Started In Texas
> Details
>
> =====================================
> From: NewsWithViews <news@n...>
> To: newsforyou-list@n...
> Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 Subject: NewsWithViews Alert
>
> July 1, 2005
> New Articles
>
> A Woman's Home is Uncle Sam's Castle
> by Selwyn Duke
>
> What do We do About the Sheeple
> http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd114.htm
> by Devvy Kidd
>
> Suburbanite Socialism
> http://www.newswithviews.com/Levant/nancy4.htm
> by Nancy Levant
>
> ====================
> "No homeowner's, merchant's, or manufacturer's property, however
> productive or valuable to its owner, is immune from condemnation
for the
> benefit of other private interests that will put it to a 'higher'
use."
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> A WOMAN'S HOME IS
>
> UNCLE SAM'S CASTLE
>
>
>
> by Selwyn Duke
> July 1, 2005
> NewsWithViews.com
> Possession may be nine tenths of the law, but not when the law
wants your
> possessions. This past Thursday was a dark day for freedom in
America, as
> the Supreme Court once again proved that its contempt for the
> Constitution is only matched by its willingness to court communism.
In a
> ruling that struck a blow for the powerful at the expense of the
little
> woman, the Court ruled that states had the right to use the
principle of
> eminent domain to seize private property for commercial
development. In
> other words, if Donald Trump wants your land so he can erect another
> casino and knows what palms to grease, you can be kicked out of your
> home.
> At issue was the case of Kelo vs. New London, involving hapless
> homeowners who have been forced to fight a city hall that wants to
seize
> their land for the ostensibly noble purpose of "public use." And
what,
> pray tell, would this public use be? Answer: to pave the way for
> different private entities - in this case rich developers - to
build a
> hotel, health club and office buildings. The city puppeteers'
supposed
> hope and definite justification are that the development will
breathe new
> life into a local economy whose star fell with the decline of its
once
> vibrant whaling industry.
> The problems with this ruling are manifold, not the least of which
is
> that it's another example of the High Court's [sometimes I wonder
what
> its members are high on] delusion that the inanimate object called
the
> Constitution can be viewed as a "living document." After all, the
fifth
> amendment does allow for the expropriation of private property for
> "public use" under the condition that just compensation is provided.
> However, I strongly suspect that the framers were thinking about
> imperatives such as the need to build a fort in a strategic position
> overlooking a strait, just in case the British Navy decides to make
sure
> that the sun never sets on its empire. I tend to doubt, though,
that they
> were overly concerned about modest churches standing in the way of
the
> building of a brand spanking new Wal-mart.
> Most striking about this ruling, however, is that it constitutes a
> blurring of the line between the public and private sector, ergo my
> opening paragraph allusion to communism. After all, at issue here
are not
> public projects such as fortifications, bridges or roads. We are now
> talking about labeling commercial development a "public use." But
what is
> "public" about a privately owned shopping mall, hotel, or
restaurant?
> Well, not surprisingly, our leftist Supreme Court Justices have,
while
> not the answer, an answer.
> The left-wing majority on the court concluded that "public use" was
to be
> defined more broadly as "public purpose." The thinking is that if a
> proposed use of someone's private property could present an economic
> benefit to the public, then the expropriation of that person's
property
> can be justified. Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the
majority,
> said that New London could seize the private property on the public
use
> basis because the proposed project promises to create more jobs and
> revenue.
> The Pandora's box opened up by such a position should be obvious. I
ask
> you, what legal business doesn't create jobs and revenue? That's
what
> businesses do. Therefore, under this reasoning it follows that any
> commercial development proposal under the sun could serve as an
eminent
> domain-enabled pretext to seize your property. Hey, even a hotdog
stand
> produces more jobs and revenue than your home does.
> This fact was not lost on Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. In what
strikes me
> as a rare moment of lucidity, she wrote in her dissent,
> "The specter of condemnation hangs over all property . . . nothing
is to
> prevent the state from replacing any Motel 6 with a Ritz-Carlton,
any
> home with a shopping mall, or any farm with a factory."
> I do concur. Moreover, what seems to have escaped everyone's notice
is
> that the leftist judges have broadened the definition of "public
use" to
> a point where they've rendered the term meaningless. After all, if a
> "public use" can in reality be any use deemed beneficial to society
by
> the powers that be, then the term has lost its raison d'Ltre. Think
about
> it: how is the specific term "public use," as defined by the court,
> distinguishable from the general term "use"? If the Founding
Mothers had
> intended for any use from which society could conceivably derive a
> benefit to be adequate justification to seize property, why the
> specificity? They could have said that property could be seized for
the
> facilitation of "good works" or "for the betterment of society,"
but they
> didn't. No, they were specific because they wanted to severely
limit the
> government's power in this area. Respect for private property rights
> always figured prominently in their thinking.
> Oblivious to this, the leftist majority seemed to echo the
conclusions of
> the Michigan Supreme Court in its disastrous 1981 Poletown decision
[a
> decision that court wisely reversed last year]. In this case, the
court
> allowed General Motors to bulldoze a whole Polish neighborhood, one
> containing over one-thousand residences, six-hundred businesses and
quite
> a number of churches, so that the corporation could construct an
auto
> plant on the site. This has become the poster-case for eminent
domain
> abuses, as one dissenting justice on that court warned that,
> "No homeowner's, merchant's, or manufacturer's property, however
> productive or valuable to its owner, is immune from condemnation
for the
> benefit of other private interests that will put it to a 'higher'
use."
> Absolutely correct, Your Honor. What folly, making government
officials
> the arbiters of the hierarchy of uses and empowering them to
discriminate
> between private parties based upon their nebulous conception of it.
After
> all, what is a higher use? Would bulldozing six old-stone churches
that
> tend to people's spiritual need be justified to make way for a
shopping
> mall that exploits people's material greed? Does woman live on bread
> alone? Higher use indeed. Some uses can't be measured in dollars and
> cents.
> But the real danger here is not misjudging uses, but misusing power.
> While the following has become a cliché - and one I despise, mind
you -
> all you have to do is follow the money. It doesn't take desert
> mystic-like discernment to know that when eminent domain is used to
> foster "economic development," it's a euphemistic way of saying that
> we're going to do a reverse-Robin Hood. Does anyone think it's a
> coincidence that eminent domain isn't used very often to obtain
land for
> a house of worship or charitable organization, or to seize homes in
upper
> crust neighborhoods? Justice O'Connor noted this as well in saying,
> "Any property may now be taken for the benefit of another private
party,
> but the fallout from this decision will not be random. The
beneficiaries
> are likely to be those citizens with disproportionate influence and
power
> in the political process, including large corporations and
development
> firms."
> She also said,
> "The government now has license to transfer property from those with
> fewer resources to those with more. The Founders cannot have
intended
> this perverse result."
> Without a doubt. Unscrupulous corporations love this misuse of
eminent
> domain because they get the land they want at the price they want
it.
> Moreover, complicit in this are greedy governments, which salivate
over
> the prospect of filling their coffers to overflowing. And this
really is
> the issue. Think about it: do you feel comfortable entrusting such
power
> to politicians, a lot that is notorious for their willingness to
commit
> malfeasance to pay back wealthy supporters and even, dare I say, for
> occasionally accepting bribes?
> Whatever windfall is realized, by big business and opportunistic or
even
> corrupt politicians, there's one thing you can take to the bank: the
> beneficiaries won't be the Americans who receive "just
compensation" for
> their stolen land. After all, what is just compensation? Let's say
I own
> a home that's been targeted for seizure and the bureaucrats decide
that
> fair market value is $75,000. Now, that just might be the most I
could
> sell it for if I put it on the block and searched for someone who
wanted
> it as a residence. However, the fact that a rich corporation has
> determined that my land is ideal for its needs and that I have no
desire
> to move changes the equation completely. You see, to entice me into
> selling, to make the bother of uprooting myself and my family
worthwhile,
> the corporation might have to offer me half a million. This is how
it
> works in a free market system.
> This is no minor point, because no piece of land has a price tag
affixed
> to it, courtesy of God. No, we're talking about value that man
assigns to
> it. Why is an acre in Beverly Hills worth far more than an acre in
the
> South Bronx? Why is an acre in the hinterlands with an oil well on
it now
> worth more than one with a water well on it, when five-hundred
years ago
> the latter would have dwarfed the former's value? Quite simply
because
> people are willing to pay more for it at this point in time.
Therefore,
> fair market value cannot be determined theoretically; it is simply
what
> one gets when operating within the context of the free market. What
this
> means is that when the government seizes my property in the above
> example, it has done nothing less than conspire with a corporation
to
> steal $425,000 from me.
> Chip Mellor, president of the Institute for Justice, said that this
> ruling sets a terrible precedent, and he's correct. In the way that
he
> means it anyway. But there's another precedent here, one that was
set
> decades ago, and this hearkens back to my remarks about communism
and the
> blurring of the distinctions between the public and private. You
see, I
> don't believe that judges could ever conclude that the definition
of the
> term "public use" could be expanded to include private sector
endeavors
> unless the demarcation between public and private was not as clear
in
> their minds as it should be. No, these are individuals who have, in
some
> measure, melded the two together when formulating their world view.
> Ominously, their ruling is just one step in a progression that is
leading
> to increasing government control over all things that now can only
> loosely be called "private."
> But it didn't start with these unjust justices. No, the precedent
was set
> a long time ago when the Court ruled that private establishments
were
> "public accommodations" in a move designed to empower government to
> eliminate unfashionable discrimination. And while that may seem
like a
> noble goal, it amounted to the trumping of business owners' freedom
of
> association, as Big Brother started dictating to them what policies
must
> prevail within their establishments. So then we had the government
> telling private entities what kind of discrimination they could
practice,
> and now we have the government discriminating as it picks and
chooses
> which private entities are worthy of retaining "their" property, and
> which ones must yield to those whose purpose is "higher." But both
these
> government intrusions share a commonality: they both shift control
over
> private property from the "owners" to the modern-day feudal lords in
> government.
> This is why principle matters, folks. Not too many complained when
the
> EEOC sued business after business for alleged discrimination, or
when the
> nanny state foisted mandate after mandate upon them. But one thing
leads
> to another. Compromise the principle of private property rights and
> you've created a slippery slope, one of whose steeper drop-offs is
called
> eminent domain, and at whose terminus can be found the netherworld
of
> tyranny.
> © 2005 Selwyn Duke - All Rights Reserved
>
>
> E-Mail: SelwynDuke@a...
>
> ================================
> This country belongs to we the people. It does not belong to Alan
> Greenspan, George Bush, Marxist Hillary Clinton, the Rothschilds,
the
> Rockefellers, Queen Elizabeth, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the ACLU,
members of
> the treasonous CFR or the treasonous Trilateral Commision.
>
> Other Devvy Articles:
> Forced Mental Health Screening for Your Children
>
>
>
>
> WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT THE SHEEPLE?
>
>
>
> By: Devvy
> July 1, 2005
> NewsWithViews.com
> "It's time for a new tea party. It's time for a new Lexington and
> Concord. It's time for a new Declaration of Independence. It's time
for
> civil disobedience and throwing off the shackles of rule by men.
It's
> time to begin plotting how to re-establish the rule of law under a
> sovereign God." Joseph Farah on the eminant domain decision by the
U.S.
> Supreme Court
> In one of my recent columns, I laid out the facts regarding the
dominant
> media in this country - and that includes cable networks such as
CNN, FOX
> and MSNBC: all of them are thoroughly compromised, as well as all
major
> newspapers and most small town papers now owned by big
conglomerates that
> are owned by the destroyers. The only course to bring them down is
to
> withdraw all financial support. Since they only understand money,
then
> let's make it about money.
> As a matter of fact, here's just one more instance of how the media
> manipulates news. The Joe Banister trial is now over; you can read
my
> coverage of the trial here. On June 25, 2005, the Sacramento
Bolshevik
> (Bee) carried a headline on the front page of their Business Section
> which reads: "Verdict cheered by tax evaders." Yep, every American
who
> understands the deception and misapplication of Title 26 are "tax
> evaders." How typical of those in the "mainstream media" who
prostitute
> themselves for a paycheck and who couldn't debate me for two
minutes on
> the subject without looking like the ignorant, braying asses they
are;
> that column is scanned here. This reporter is a pathetic example
not just
> of bias, but of ignorance of the legal aspects of Joe's case. But,
that's
> what you get from the "mainstream media" and I say enough is
enough.
> As the situation in our Republic continues to deteriorate, millions
of
> Americans continue to ask the question: What is wrong with the
American
> people that they can't see what's right in front of their face?
They're
> nothing but a bunch of sheep." It's a sad commentary for the
history of
> this country that the great majority of so-called Americans only
pay lip
> service to our Constitution, too many have no clue about the
history of
> this nation and others are being allowed to operate in this country
when
> their sole purpose is to destroy US.
> This process has taken decades, probably a century if you want to
be real
> honest about it. Just take a look around you. Everywhere you see
nothing
> but people on cell phones non stop. What on earth are they
blathering
> about for hours on end? The push to medicate the senior population
went
> into hyper drive four or five years ago and sadly, so many are
walking
> around in a haze, they wouldn't recognize treason if it slapped
them in
> the face. For the past forty years, America's schools have turned
out
> nothing more than zombies on a mass scale. Certainly, some of
America's
> children have managed to get an education in the government's
> indoctrination centers and more of them are becoming vocal about
what
> they are seeing. But, I believe and this is just my opinion, the
only
> reason is because they had parents who were an active participant in
> their child's education and counter the propaganda fed to them.
> Our culture, our way of life and our very freedoms are under attack
from
> every level of government. We have out right traitors serving in
public
> office. We are under attack from organizations like La Raza, who
openly
> advocate sedition. Yet, the barnyard animals out there who pass them
> selves off as Americans seemingly have no clue and tragically, they
don't
> want the truth. Either from fatal blind loyalty to the Democrat or
> Republican parties, laziness or because their brains are simply
cooked
> from decades of ingesting dangerous prescription drugs (including
evil
> ones like Prozac, Ritalin, Luvox), being pumped full of dangerous
> vaccines, the food they're eating, aspartame and and fluoride. [See
Video
> on Aspartame and read book on Fluoride]
> The government's media apparatus will continue to label anyone with
a
> clear head that is attempting to warn people about what they're
putting
> in their bodies as nothing but conspiracy wackos, but even their
attempts
> are starting to lose steam and more as more Americans do begin to
wake up
> and get the facts. What I find rather amazing is that Americans who
> supposedly are so happy and fulfilled - millions of them are filing
their
> bodies with booze and drugs like cocaine, while poisoning their
minds and
> moral standards with porn and the garbage on TV and the movie
theaters.
> So, what do we do about the 'sheeple'? I've been in this movement
fifteen
> years and I can tell you from experience, I can tell within two
minutes
> whether someone is receptive to hearing the truth about whatever
issue it
> is that happens to come up in a discussion. If that individual
> demonstrates at least some interest, I give them a few bite size
pieces
> of information and my business card letting them know where they
can read
> my columns. If they have that glazed over or impatient look, which
tells
> me they're too busy to see the truth, I simply say, "Have a nice
day" and
> go about my business.
> I shall always remember a speech I gave up in Washington State back
in
> 1996. After my speech, one man stood up in the audience and
said, "Devvy,
> I've been trying for two years to get my brother in law to wake
up...." I
> stopped this sincere man and said, "Two years? You mean you've
spent two
> years trying to get a potato head to find love for his country?
Forget
> him, family member or not and move on." If someone isn't interested
in
> their freedom or the truth, bludgeoning them over the head with two
> hundred years of world history and current events won't make any
> difference. Several years ago I was on Amtrak and went to the
dining car
> for dinner. There were two couples in the booth next to me, very
well
> dressed, both men sporting the big, calcified bellies. One of them
was
> joking around with the waiter and said, "Hey, I've done my part, I'm
> retired and I'm not going to let anything bother me because there
are too
> many good golf courses waiting!" He thought it was hilarious. I
didn't.
> I could go on and on, but we all see this out in America in one
form or
> another. It is incredibly frustrating, but I submit to you that
those who
> birthed this Republic went through the same thing. Back in 1776, so
few
> understood the concept of real freedom, what was going on in
Philadelphia
> and the war for independence. The Founders didn't have the same
tools we
> do to reach large numbers of people. Back then, it was only the Paul
> Revere's out there spreading the word. The freedom fighters back
then had
> the same problem we do today: too many people don't really
understand
> freedom and too many are dependent upon state, county, city and
federal
> paychecks. Back in 1776, a huge percentage of the colonials were
> dependent upon King George for their financial well being. The
> inhabitants of the new land didn't have telephones, fax machines or
the
> Internet. Today, we the people have far more advantages than those
who
> fought for the freedoms we enjoy, we just need to follow the
examples of
> some very successful operations (see below).
> We can't reach 170 million adult aged Americans without television
and
> there is no network for constitutionalists. The sad part is that
tens of
> millions of Americans are glued to "reality TV" night after night.
There
> isn't any reality TV, just fake TV. These so-called 'reality TV'
programs
> are nothing more than dysfunctional exhibitionists who will do
anything
> to get on the tube. These so-called "reality tv" programs are
toxic, but
> the cattle sit on their couches, chewing their cud or favorite junk
food
> with their eyes glazed over.
> We can't baby sit 170 million adult aged Americans. This nation has
been
> invaded with people coming from third world countries who care
nothing
> for freedom or becoming an American, they have their hands out and
learn
> early on how to play the system. What we can do is focus on those
who do
> want the truth, continue reaching out to our fellow Americans and
forget
> those who are simply little better than barnyard animals, grazing
cattle
> or sheep that follow, but never question.
> Great things in history have never been done by the majority, but
always
> by a small core of dedicated individuals who make things happen.
History
> is replete with examples, i.e. The Alamo (not the trash depicted in
> Disney's bomb released in 2004 titled The Alamo.) And this is why
you are
> special. Because you have taken the time to research the issues and
> understand the bigger picture and goals of the elite who rule the
world
> with money. Because no matter the opposition, you have stood firm
and
> unwavering in your determination to restore America to a
constitutional
> republic - even when your own family members give you grief.
> Everyday I meet Americans who want to know more about a particular
issue.
> I also encounter the cattle whose blind loyalty to Bush, the GOP,
Hillary
> or the Democratic party. These foolish people absolutely refuse to
listen
> to any rational discussion that their heroes are not what they seem.
> Samuel Adams, the great revolutionary leader had these words for
these
> people: "If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of
> servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home
from us
> in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the
> hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may
> posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
> The great folks of Tennessee demonstrated that if you put enough
heat on
> these career politicians who dance to the tune of those that
purchase
> their favors, you can stop them dead in their tracks. The Minutemen
have
> demonstrated that with a carefully thought out plan and resolve,
you can
> become a force to be reckoned with and grow stronger. There are
> organizations all over this country fighting to stop this assault
on our
> freedom, our property rights and our families. We need to clean out
all
> these politicians at all levels who are making these laws and those
> enforcing them. We the people know all about vote fraud, how
electronic
> voting machines are stealing our elections and we will put a stop
to it.
> We the people have had it with our military being sent around the
globe
> to fight and die for a one world order and oil. No more will our
sons and
> fathers be sent to die for the globalists. We will get the truth
about
> Oklahoma City, TWA Flight 800 and September 11, 2001.
> We the people who understand the insidous agenda behind the so-
called
> National ID intend to fight this in a court of law and fill our
state
> legislatures in 2006 with constitutionalists who will reject this
> voluntary federal scheme. We the people by the millions will never
submit
> our children or grand children to any forced mental health
screening and
> we will never accept any human chipping. Only fools have allowed
> themselves to be "fitted" with a microchip because that's how
slaves are
> made.
> We the people will stop giving our money to any corporation or
company
> that has or is going to ship American jobs to our mortal enemy,
Communist
> China or any other country. GM is cutting 25,000 jobs. Millions
more will
> go south of the hemisphere if Bush gets his way and these sell outs
in
> Congress pass the FTAA and CAFTA. Here's a putrid example of how
> desperate some Americans have become:
> "Blue Collar Workers move to China, India to reclaim lost jobs Mass
> exodus of manufacturing jobs prompts mass migration of American
workers
> to the Third World .
> "Kellerman hopes he will fit in at his new job in Calcutta. Free
Trade
> Zone--Thousands of blue collar workers are leaving the United
States in
> pursuit of the 2.7 manufacturing jobs that moved overseas during
the past
> three years. Deke Kellerman, a worker at the recently-closed Maytag
Plant
> in Galesburg, Illinois, is moving his family to India so that he
can keep
> his job constructing refrigerators. His pay will be cut from $11.95
to a
> whooping 35 cents an hour. "There aren't any jobs here in the states
> anymore," Kellerman said. "So me and Missy, Deke Jr. and Delyn
decided
> we'd move over there and give it a shot. I figure as long as they
got a
> Mickey D's and I can catch the Bears on TV, I'll be happy." The
> Kellermans are not the only family from the closed Maytag plant
that are
> moving half-way around the world to save their jobs."
> Buy Maytag? In a pig's ear. We the people will force these
companies to
> reopen factories here in these united States of America by letting
the
> junk from foreign countries sit in stores until they turn to dust.
After
> 80 years, Brach's Candy shut down their American factories and
moved them
> to Canada, laying off hundreds of Americans. Their candy can rot on
the
> store shelf for all I care. Loyal American workers built these huge
> conglomerates like Maytag, GE, and all the others. The minute NAFTA
was
> unconstitutionally signed into law, they dumped on faithful American
> workers and millions of jobs went to Mexico and Communist China.
Now, our
> good jobs - by the tens of thousands - are going to India, Macao,
> Indonesia, Communist Hong Kong, Communist Viet Nam, Communist
Russia, the
> Philippines, Brazil while Americans fill burger flipping jobs or
jobs
> that push paper for foreign dictatorships.
> We will not buy from Mexico while their corrupt president supports
and
> condones illegals crossing the border into America, bringing crime
and
> disease and taking jobs that Americans will do and did before this
> invasion began. We will not do business with service reps over the
phone
> in India or any other foreign country. Those jobs used to belong to
> Americans and by God, we will protect our job base the same as every
> other country on this earth. People need to remember these words of
> wisdom before it's too late:
> George Washington said in 1789, "I shall always take a peculiar
pleasure
> in giving every proper encouragement in my power to the
manufacturers of
> my country."
> Thomas Jefferson weighed in back in 1815 with, "He, therefore, who
is now
> against domestic manufacture, must be for reducing us either to
> dependence on that foreign nation, or be clothed in skins, and to
live
> like beasts in dens and caverns. I am not one of those."
> Congressman Henry Clay said back in 1824, "The measure of the
wealth of a
> nation is indicated by the measure of its protection of its
industry; the
> measure of the poverty of a nation is marked by the degree in which
it
> neglects and abandons the care of its own industry, leaving it
exposed to
> the action of foreign powers.
> Abraham Lincoln said, If we buy a steel rail from England, we have
the
> rail and they have the money. But, if we buy it from ourselves, we
have
> both the rail and the money."
> Senator George Malone warned in 1958: "The global theory of free
trade is
> siphoning off America's wealth and bringing her economy to the
level of
> others. The theory is displacing American workers who otherwise
would be
> employed." The strongest words might be those of Andy Jackson when
he
> said back in 1833: "Tell them (the South Carolinians who wanted to
> nullify the Tariff Act of 1832) that I will hang the first man of
them I
> can get my hands on to the first tree I can find."
> Samuel Adams had something else to say that rings loud and clear
today:
> "The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil
constitution, are
> worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them
against
> all attacks. We have received them as a fair inheritance from our
worthy
> ancestors; they purchased them for us with toil and danger and
expense of
> treasure and blood, and transmitted them to us with care and
diligence.
> It will bring an everlasting mark of infamy on the present
generation,
> enlightened as it is, if we should suffer them to be wrested from
us by
> violence without a struggle or be cheated out of them by the
artifices of
> false and designing men."
> This country belongs to we the people. It does not belong to Alan
> Greenspan, George Bush, Marxist Hillary Clinton, the Rothschilds,
the
> Rockefellers, Queen Elizabeth, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the ACLU,
members of
> the treasonous CFR or the treasonous Trilateral Commision. These
> globalists need to understand that we will fight for our country,
our
> history, our way of life, our property and our families. The
Constitution
> contains no clause that allows politicians to alter it or nullify
it at
> their whim. We the people are fed up with the stealing of our
property,
> the destruction of our Second Amendment rights and our ability to
enjoy
> the freedoms given to us by those who spilled thousands of gallons
of
> blood on the battle field.
> Our numbers grow by the day. We need to stay focused, we need to
clean
> out our state legislatures - except for those we know who are
standing up
> for this Republic (Not a democracy!). We need to target law
enforcement,
> active military and veterans with factual information to prove to
them
> that the agenda of the one worlders is to destroy all we hold
dear.
> No matter how bad things look, remember that those who birthed this
> Republic suffered great hardships as well. George Washington was
paying
> troops out of his own pocket while the battle fields were running
red
> with the blood of colonials who were called to serve the cause of
> freedom. Today we fight for that same noble cause in the name of
all that
> is right. Forget the sheeple. They're the same run of the mill
sheeple
> who were jumping out of windows in 1929 because they weren't paying
> attention or didn't want the truth. Become the wind. Believe it.
Live it
> and stay the course.
> © 2005 Devvy Kidd - All Rights Reserved
>
>
> www.NewsWithViews.com.
> Devvy's website: www.devvy.com
> E-mail is: devvyk@e...
>
> =======================================
> Addictive adult devotions to schools and extracurricular activities,
> rigorous physical training of children, and yet unaware of the
Socialist
> curriculum and the dumbing-down of children, unaware of the
compulsory
> mental health screening and profiling assessments...
>
> SUBURBANITE SOCIALISM
>
>
>
> Nancy Levant
> July 1, 2005
> NewsWithViews.com
> Suburban families are really busy. They are working to support
> McMansions, impeccable yards, expensive and immaculately cleaned and
> polished automobiles, expensive social functions and clubs, gym
> memberships, day spa hair nail/pedicure, tanning, waxing, and
massage
> expenses, housekeepers and landscapers, shopping excursions, and
youth
> sports. They are wrapped up, so to speak, in image cults, which
literally
> take every second of every day.
> Meanwhile, in the land of facts and truth, their nation dies off in
> hunks. Older citizens realize this. So do many citizens under the
age of
> 25, but the 30 to mid-40-somethings are largely non-functioning
citizens.
> They are quite busy, but their citizenship skills are largely
> non-existent. Apparently, the draw of super-stores, vanity
industries,
> and elite youth sports has a larger appeal to suburbanites than
does the
> survival of America.
> It has somehow escaped them that the public school system is a
bastion of
> Socialist indoctrination. Compulsory mental health screenings
linked to
> pharmaceutical corporations, information brokers, profiling, and
> resulting database collections have gone right over the heads of
suburban
> adults. Instead, dads plan golf excursions. Moms plan sports
tournaments,
> parties, outings, and play dates.
> There is next to no outcry from the suburbs on issues ranging from
loss
> of private property rights, eminent domain, the Patriot Act, NAFTA-
CAFTA,
> illegal immigration, mercury in childhood vaccines, the New Freedom
> Initiative via executive order, No Child Left Behind, Outcome-Based
> Education, the religion of GAIA, lie-based environmentalism and its
land
> trust schemes and bureaucracies, HAARP and ELF technologies,
screening
> pregnant women, screening school children (and younger), on and on.
I
> guess suburbanites are too busy to read, to notice, or to react.
> Self-involvement requires much effort. Self-absorption requires
blindness
> and indifference. Unadulterated vanity requires pathological
selfishness.
> The addiction to sports and realty TV requires highly developed
> shallowness.
> Socialism, for the record, is enslavement. Historically, many have
> advertised Socialist utopias, but forced implementation was never
founded
> upon utopian principles. It was founded upon a 2-class system – the
> aristocracy and those owned by the aristocracy, the owners of all
and the
> owners of nothing. Theoretically, utopian socialism was meant to
level
> the playing field, but it has religiously, if I may still use that
term,
> and historically collapsed the playing field for the 99%, while
lifting
> the 1% to absurd and dangerous levels of wealth and power.
> Suburbanites are broke. They are bankrupt, because they owe, on
average,
> $100,000.00 to $200,000.00 to creditors, and they spend non-stop.
Instead
> of keeping up with the Jones', they attempt to keep up with media
images.
> Equally, many suburbanites over-drink. Sorry, but true. Many, in
true
> Hollywood form, have purposefully placed themselves into the hands
of
> "therapists."
> Suburbanites infamously ostracize those outside of their social and
> neighborhood circles. They ostracize the divorced and the poor, and
they
> are often mean-spirited gossips. They are infamous for slutting up
> teenage daughters with immodest clothing and the acceptance of
trashy
> role models, and they are infamous for cheerleader training, which
> includes the lessons of social ostracism. Many suburbanites belong
to
> community-based country clubs, which, via consensus, define further
> ostracism rules.
> Boys spend hours upon hours on a weekly basis with coaches and
trainers,
> and are overly subjugated to absurdly dangerous and non-stop
physical
> regimens. Hmmm. When you think about it, the suburbs and their
occupants
> appear to be highly involved in a highly socialistic training
program.
> Addictive adult devotions to schools and extracurricular activities,
> rigorous physical training of children, and yet unaware of the
Socialist
> curriculum and the dumbing-down of children, unaware of the
compulsory
> mental health screening and profiling assessments; shunning,
gossiping,
> neighbor watching neighbor, social ostracism, and highly involved
with
> the mental and physical manipulations of children - adults in
suburbia
> have become very peculiar. And in between times, most are obsessed
with
> vanity, debt building, community visual standards, and mind-numbing
> television. Hmmm.
>
> If you've ever tried to talk to such people about "the" Supreme
Court
> ruling, or the "environmental movement" land trust scams, the New
Freedom
> Initiative, or executive orders, you will hear one-liners like,
> "Interesting!" Or "I haven't heard about that." And you will also
notice
> their uncanny ability to change subjects with impeccable social
grace.
>
> The Socialist experiment certainly worked like a charm in the
American
> suburbs, and these Americans are a formidable challenge to the real
> citizens of this nation. Suburbia bought it, hook, line, and
sinker, and
> they haven't a clue. We must roll up our sleeves. They're a tough
crowd.
> They have learned their subliminal messages well.
> Websites for Wisdoms:
> www.acl.us.tt
> www.unslaver.com
> www.federalobserver.com
> www.klamathbucketbrigade.org
> www.amerikanexpose.com
> © 2005 Nancy Levant - All Rights Reserved
>
>
>
> E-Mail: nlevant@w...
> =======================================
> Checkout this.....
>
>
> In Lackawanna, N.Y., where six men were detained in a similar
terrorism
> investigation in September 2002, Cessna planes were used to track
> e-mails, cell phones and wireless Internet activity, as well as
keeping
> track of some suspects, Police Chief Dennis O'Hara said.
>
> http://www.globalnewsmatrix.com/modules.php?
name=News&file=article&sid=16
> 06
>
> ============================
> Bush Administration creates "Secret State Police"
>
>
> by Michel Chossudovsky
>
> June 30, 2005
> GlobalResearch.ca
>
>
>
>
> The Bush Administration is to set up a "domestic spy service",
pursuant
> to the recommendations of a Commission led by US Circuit Judge
Laurence
> Silberman and former Senator Charles S. Robb of Virginia, the so-
called
> Silberman-Rob Commission.
> The new "domestic intelligence department" is slated to combine FBI
> counterterrorism, intelligence and espionage operations into a
single
> service. The latter operating under the auspices of the FBI will
have the
> authority to "seize the property of people deemed to be helping the
> spread of WMD".
> The decision was formally announced by FBI Director Mueller and
Attorney
> General Gonzales at a press conference at the Attorney General's
Office
> on the 29th, the same day as Bush's speech broadcast live from Fort
> Bragg, NC. The decision to create a secret police passed virtually
> unnoticed. The imitative was described as as a necessary step in
> "protecting the American public":
> "It pulls together the Counterintelligence Division, the
Counterterrorism
> Division, and the Directorate of Intelligence, enabling it to act
> together to develop intelligence and then to act on that
intelligence, in
> consultation with not only Department of Justice but also the
Director of
> National Intelligence (DNI). We look forward to working with the
DNI over
> the next 60 days to put in place additional steps that may be
required to
> give full implementation to the development of this National
Security
> Service." ( http://www.fbi.gov/page2/june05/nss062905.htm )
> The new department --meaning essentially a Big Brother "Secret State
> Police"-- will be able to "spy on people in America suspected of
> terrorism or having critical intelligence information, even if they
are
> not suspected of committing a crime." (NBC Tonight, 29 June 2005).
> The initiative not only modifies the mandate of the FBI, it also
> undermines its autonomy as a civilian law enforcement bureau.
Although
> formally operating under the FBI, the proposed centralized domestic
spy
> unit will be controlled by the Directorate of National Intelligence
> headed by John Negroponte, who will set both the budget and
priorities of
> the new FBI department.
> According to Timothy Edgar, of The American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU):
> "The FBI is effectively being taken over by a spymaster who reports
> directly to the White House. ... It's alarming that the same person
who
> oversees foreign spying will now oversee domestic spying too."
> Overriding the independence of the FBI, Negroponte will call the
shots
> regarding the appointment of the head of the proposed unit. (High-
level
> appointments at the FBI are made by its director, subject to the
formal
> approval of the Attorney General. The intrusion of the Director of
> National Intelligence in senior FBI appointments sets an important
> precedent, which contradicts the mandate and statutes of the FBI.)
> Mandate
> The new FBI department involves the integration of law enforcement
and
> domestic spying. Its mandate is essentially political and is
directed at
> curbing all forms of social and political dissent in America . It is
> concerned with various categories of "domestic enemies",
which "threaten
> the security of the Homeland", namely which question the legitimacy
of
> the "war on terrorism". According to a 2004 Report of the Homeland
> Security Council , these domestic "conspirators" are said to be
acting in
> coordination with "foreign terrorists". The Report
identified "domestic
> radical groups" and "disgruntled employees" (labor activists) as
> potential domestic enemies (See Michel Chossudovsky,
> http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?
context=viewArticle&code=CHO200506
> 07&articleId=173 )
> Officials have stated, however, that the new department will also
include
> "an office of civil liberties ... created to prevent abuses".
According
> to US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales: "We're going to operate in
a way
> that best protects this country and we do so in a way that respects
the
> privacy rights and civil liberties of every American." (quoted in
NBC
> Report, op cit)
>
>
> http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?
context=viewArticle&code=CHO200506
> 30&articleId=601
> ====================================================
> Symbols, slogans and spin
> By Tibor S. Friedman
>
> June 29, 2005—Americans surround themselves with symbols that
represent
> who they think they are or want to be. Symbols and slogans
conveniently
> defer introspection and curiosity.
> True patriotism and love of country requires we go beyond putting
Support
> Your Troops magnets or flags on our cars. The Great American
experiment
> in democracy is in crisis and immediate jeopardy. The most secretive
> administration ever has installed a repressive security apparatus
paving
> the way for dictatorship and martial law awaiting an 'event' to
trigger
> the trap set for us. Unless we become active participants and
educate
> ourselves about the crisis that is rapidly enveloping us the Great
> Experiment will end.
> Americans are generally good-hearted folk who believe that their
leaders
> are benign and serve the best interests of the people. Simple
inquiry
> would surely convince us otherwise. Americans aren't stupid but
> uninformed of what is really happening in their country and the
world
> because of the dumbed down content and propaganda they consume in
the
> mainstream media (MSM) and the public educational system. Recent
studies
> have declared that high school graduates are unable to write a
coherent
> sentence; schools teach information and expect students to retain
and
> regurgitate data, not connect them. This is by design; the elite do
not
> want too many critical thinkers in a diminished economy.
> The MSM (and alternative sources on the Internet in particular)
holds the
> key to our real insight into what is happening in our country and
the
> world as well.
> Information is the currency of the realm. The Internet today offers
our
> best hope for our education and research, at least until the Elite
figure
> out how to replace it with the restricted and establishment
controlled
> Internet 2 currently being developed.
> Information is managed and edited in the MSM and propaganda is an
> acceptable tool long used in media and education. Spin is the
method of
> the day used to confuse and deflect. The Infotainment Industry—MSM
and
> Hollywood combined—share financial, operational and propaganda
interests.
> A recent example is the TV docudrama Oil Storm on Fox TV on June 5
that
> served the goals of putting fear into Americans about losing their
oil
> lifeline and their American way of life and to gather support for
the
> 21st Century Oil Wars by calling them the War on Terror, which is
phony
> and being used by the psychopaths to divide us and reduce our
numbers.
> The Bush administration is supported by Fox (aka GOP TV) owner
Rupert
> Murdoch. Similarly, other media events usually have some ulterior
motive
> to influence the public in some way.
> For us to fully appreciate our current crisis we have to review our
media
> history.
> Walter Lippmann, the prominent journalist in the 1920s, said that
the
> public must be put in its place. He believed, as did Woodrow Wilson
and
> the Elite, that the responsible men (Elite) should manage
the 'common
> interests' and 'live free of the trampling and the roar of a
bewildered
> herd,' the ignorant and meddlesome outsiders. The only function the
> 'herd' has was to trample periodically in support of one or another
> element of the leadership class in an election.
> As the 'herd' in the last century became more enlightened ever more
> sophisticated mechanisms for controlling information and
perceptions have
> developed. The manufacture of consent, a term created by Edward
Bernays,
> the father of the Public Relations industry, author of Propaganda
and
> coincidentally Sigmund Freud's nephew, has become an art form and
> required of journalists.
> Bernays says: "Those who manipulate the organized habits and
opinions of
> the masses constitute an invisible government which is the true
ruling
> power of our country. . . . we are dominated by a relatively small
number
> of persons. . . as civilization has become more complex. . . . the
> technical means have been invented and developed by which opinion
may be
> regimented. . . . I must lead the people. Am I not their servant?
> "The invisible government tends to be concentrated in the hands of
the
> few because of the expense of manipulating the social machinery
which
> controls the opinions and habits of the masses. It is not generally
> realized to what extent the words and actions of our most
influential
> public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the
scenes."
> Expanding on this understanding about the MSM and the Public
Relations
> industry (the propaganda machine) we can include gatekeepers, or
sources
> considered to be on the left (so-called liberals), who are charged
with
> making sure that dissent and alternative views do not stray too far
off
> the reservation of Elite acceptance. Excluded topics include the
9/11
> Truth Movement, the New World Order, the City Of London financial
center,
> chemtrails, the Federal Reserve, Inc., etc. It is safe to assume
that
> your letters to the editor are monitored and pre-selected prior to
> printing. I suspect that some letters and articles in The New York
Times
> (as elsewhere) are fictitious, manufactured and planted, like the
Judith
> Miller articles on WMDs (with con man Chalabi as her source) in the
NYT
> prior to the current Iraq War that encouraged the congressional
vote to
> go to war. MSM always supports and benefits from war. CNN's Aaron
Brown
> declared that now that we are at war we have to get behind the
government
> and the troops disregarding CNN's obvious cheerleading efforts to
build
> support before the war.
> My purpose of this article is to address the obvious fantasies
about our
> democracy and the so-called free press (MSM) and their failure to
provide
> Americans with real information for making educated decisions; we
are
> considered the least informed population in the world. The MSM and
most
> gatekeepers are believed to be infiltrated with CIA personnel and
work
> explicitly for the Elites in power, in corporations, government and
> banking and serve to protect their interests in the US and abroad.
My
> ultimate purpose is to compel Americans to wake up and begin to
explore
> what is going on and to become engaged in their lives and their
> children's futures.
> It is not my intent here to go into all the aspects that constitute
the
> over arching plan (conspiracy, some would say) to create a One (New)
> World (Order) Government—a generational and incremental
implementation
> process that, now in its final stages, presently threatens the
world with
> the 21st Century Oil Wars and the destruction of what little
sovereignty
> is left in America and elsewhere (observe this process in the EU).
> Neo-liberalism / Globalism (imperialism disguised as democracy and
free
> trade) are names used to describe the acquisition and consolidation
of
> ever greater wealth, natural resources, total political power and
control
> over others and are the motivational forces which drive the
decisions by
> the international Elite. They control the transnational
corporations, the
> 200-plus think tanks (the Council On Foreign Relations being
foremost in
> the US) which exist to facilitate their goals, the foundations
(Carnegie,
> Ford, Rockefeller, etc), the World Bank, IMF, WTO, the Federal
Reserve (a
> private corporation never audited and with no congressional
oversight);
> this influence is pervasive and can only be truly appreciated as one
> researches the various issues.
> I will provide at the end a list of informative articles, authors
and
> websites for those interested in doing research into these critical
> issues. These are some of many qualified writers, journalists and
> researchers who have, based on their investigative research,
experience
> and knowledge, documented valuable information for those interested
in
> discovering the truth.
> Themes and Trends
> The recent Online Journal report on Bilderberg 2005 confirms the
intent
> and complicity of our leaders and the transnational corporations and
> banking interests they serve to create a One World Government using
the
> UN, or similar institution, and to further diminish America
economically
> and to ultimately abdicate US sovereignty and the Constitution to a
> Regional and subsequent World Power while enriching themselves and
> accumulating power in the process.
> The Congress, MSM (including CPB, NPR and PBS), all academic and
other
> Institutions, with rare and generally marginalized, individuals as
> exceptions, are in general alignment with this 'conspiracy.' This
diverse
> involvement is reflected in the roster of the 4,000 or so members
of the
> Council on Foreign Relations, a group described as, superficially an
> innocent forum for academics, businessman, politicians, contains
within
> its shell, perhaps unknown to many of its members, the power elite
that
> unilaterally determines US foreign policy. The major objective of
this
> submerged - and obvious subversive–foreign policy is the
acquisition of
> markets and economic power (profits) for a small group of giant
> multi-nationals under the virtual control of a few banking
investment
> houses and controlling families.
> The Royal Institute of International Affairs, in London (the center
of
> power for the New World Order elite), founded its American wing,
the CFR,
> funded by the Rockefellers, in 1921. The RIIA's patron is the Queen
of
> England.
> CNN has recently been using CFR 'spokespeople' to get Americans to
accept
> them as 'mainstream' and also uses other conservative think tanks
like
> the American Enterprise Institute and the Brookings and CATO
Institutes
> to disseminate their views designed to shape American perceptions
and
> beliefs.
> Think tanks provide the two supposedly oppositional political
parties
> with intellectual material and propaganda. Issues are used as
> smokescreens and for public distraction and confusion while greater
and
> more relevant issues are ignored or downplayed. What we witness in
MSM is
> the allowed official version of reality–much of it staged theatre.
It is
> apparent as one examines (CFR, TC, Bilderberg member) Bill Clinton's
> record (presiding over NAFTA, media consolidation, FDA approval of
GMO
> going into the world's food supply via Monsanto, laid the
foundations for
> the USA PATRIOT Act, passed welfare 'reform' etc.) and associations
that
> he is as much (if not more so) a Globalist / New World Order
operative as
> George Bush is. Both parties serve the same masters as one can see
from
> the Bilderberg attendance list.
> John Edwards auditioned at the annual Bilderberg meeting in 2004;
> apparently the elite chose to stay the course with George Bush. One
> cannot become president of the US without the Elites' explicit
approval.
> The election is a formality and exercise for the benefit of
creating the
> illusion of an ongoing democracy. The 'free speech zone' areas
created by
> both parties in 2004 were their version of democracy. The MSM
(already)
> is focusing on the battle for the White House 2008, creating
mythologies
> of opposing individuals and distracting the public with a hope for
change
> that never comes—as both parties work towards the creation of a New
World
> Order with the United States as a much reduced power, economically
and
> militarily. Remember that politicians are the fronts for (or part
of) the
> Elites and as such share in their fortunes and power. One need only
look
> at the Bush dynasty and their involvement in and creation of their
> fortunes and power by the Military / Industrial / Intelligence
Complex.
> War is profitable.
> Henry Kissinger (perennial Bilderberg, Trilateral, CFR member)
received
> knighthood from the Queen of England in 1995 for his lifelong
devoted
> service to the Crown; after years of trying to retake the American
> colonies the City of London decided to infiltrate through the CFR
and
> other ways to reclaim their perceived influence over their new
addition
> to the Empire; and so it appears it has. Their conspiracy has
become our
> fact.
> Conspiracy theories are a convenient 'slide' term used by MSM and
others
> to short circuit further inquiry into a matter. The greatest
conspiracy
> is the one created by this concept that keeps people from being
> inquisitive and concerned about the health and direction of their
> country. As noted, only a small group of Elites know the full scope
of
> their agenda while those outside are given information on a need to
know
> basis and as loyalty and subservience is developed move closer to
the
> center of affluence and control. A corporation is a perfect example
of
> this where one can succeed and move up the hierarchy as long as one
> fulfills the needs of the corporation but if one challenges the
system,
> then you could be ejected and possibly blacklisted from entry into
other
> corporations. In this way, people buy into the system and by being
> invested in it are reluctant to jeopardize their position and
wealth.
> Hierarchy assures compliance, promotions or corrective actions if
needed.
> America is a transnational corporation (an Enron) disguised as a
> government; a form described as totalitarian corporatism.
> What can you do?
> As Catherine Austin Fitts and others suggest, voting, writing to
your
> representatives or editors has limited, if any effect, but continue
> letting them know what you think. The system is generally rigged
with
> gatekeepers to marginalize any dissent or resistance.
> The only practical options open are to divert our financial and
personal
> support for the tapeworm (the system) by withdrawing our attention
from
> TV (shut it off) and its mind control and our money out of large
> multinational banks and corporations that depend on our money to
survive,
> and putting it into local banks and businesses; cut up all your
credit
> cards. Support local efforts to develop sustainable economies and
> environmental initiatives; get to know your neighbors and share
what you
> know.
> Ultimately, the tapeworm will have only itself to devour.
> Stop supporting the so-called two-party system that is really two
groups
> belonging to the same business party that share the One World
Government
> agenda. The continuity of bipartisan corruption clearly shows that,
with
> rare exceptions like Reps Cynthia McKinney and Ron Paul, their
allegiance
> is to the international elite and not to the American people.
> Resource List
> I would suggest that you save, on your hard drive, CD, disk, memory
stick
> or print those articles you believe are important to you.
> The underlined reference listing can be used on Google for access to
> article (not linked).
> Economics and the Economy
> Will You Survive the Coming Financial Crash? Kent Daniel Bentkowski
(pdf)
> 2005.
> - A former investment banker's excellent overview of the dumbing
down of
> Americans, the CFR, Bilderberg, NWO, Federal Reserve, Inc., and
related
> financial issues.
> The Negative Return Economy Scoop: Sanders/Austin Fitts
> The (bipartisan) United States government has operated a secret
budgeting
> and spending program for decades outside the framework of the
American
> Constitution. Shocking!
> Will The Real Economic Hit Men Please Stand Up? Catherine Austin
Fitts
> Meditations on 9/11 Truth: Commentary and review of 21st Century
Economic
> Warfare.
> The Endangered US Dollar Museletter #149 Richard Heinberg
> History of money, the dollar, strong dollar policy and petrodollars
> The Destruction of The American Economy (TBRNews.org/archives 1306)
> Andre Gunder Frank (recently deceased–we'll miss him) - Biting
critique
> of Uncle Sam's money, IMF, WB policies–article aptly follows list of
> Republican Corporate donors.
> Oil, War and Empire
> Chalmers Johnson, author of Four Sorrows of Empire:
> 'America's Empire of Bases'–(Commondreams.org) America's 1000 world
wide
> bases.
> 'No Longer the 'Lone' Superpower'–(Commondreams.org–Tomdispatch.com)
> Coming to terms with China–excellent overview of regional dynamics
and
> Americas role.
> Jeffrey St. Clair (Counterpunch.org) co-author (with Alexander
Cockburn)
> of 'Dimes Worth of Difference: Beyond the Lesser of Two Evils'–A
critical
> view of the nonexistent and mythological differences between the
> Democrats & Republican–the Republicrats:
> 'One for Oil and Oil for One'–Examines the Bipartisan Oiligarchy
and the
> Environmental group's complicity and involvement in deception.
> 'The Mark of Mc Cain'–an expose on how the media helps to
mythologize a
> politician–a hollow and opportunistic John McCain.
> Lockheed and Loaded - Jeffrey St. Clair (counterpunch.org)–The
Company
> that Runs the Empire
> F. William Engdahl, author of A Century of War - Anglo-American Oil
> Politics and The New World Order
> 'The Oil factor in Bush's 'war on tyranny''–Asia Times (3/3/05)
> 'A New American Century'–Iraq and the hidden euro-dollars war - the
> Petrodollar era.
> Blood, Oil, Guns, and Bullets - Aziz Choudry - Penetrating look at
the
> American Oiligarchy, the Bush regime and their military assault on
the
> world.
> The Globalists and Islamists–Fomenting the 'clash of civilizations'
for
> the New World Order–Excellent historical overview of Anglo-American
oil
> imperialism and the overthrow of democracies. History forgotten
(omitted)
> is repeated . . .
> Webster Tarpley (on his website):
> 'The Unauthorized Biography of George H W Bush' (free online
> book)–Written in 1991 but relevant and excellent history of the
rise of
> the Bush dynasty from Prescott to George, Jr. with help from the
> Harrimans, Rockefellers and other elites.
> 'Against Oligarchy'–British Financial Warfare: How the City of
London
> created the Great Depression–or how the NWO elites manipulate the
global
> economy . .
> Aerosol and Electromagnetic Weapons in the Age of Nuclear War - Amy
> Worthington
> A frightening survey of weapons being used and developed by the USG
for
> use against its own people and the world; depleted uranium,
Chemtrails,
> HAARP, etc.
> War is a Racket by Smedley Darlington Butler, Major General
> Making war for Wall Street and corporations–from WW1–nothings
changed.
> The Splendid failure of Occupation (onlinejournal.com) by B.J Sabri-
> Ongoing fascinating, informative series on the war of empire in
Iraq and
> other issues . . .
> New World Order
> The Neocons Second Front Anne Williamson, May 26, 2005
> (sandersresearch.com)
> - Examines Wolfowitz/Bolton new assignments in context of the next
stage
> of empire.
> The Brotherhood and the Manipulation of Society Parts 1–10
> (educate–yourself.org)
> By Ivan Fraser and Mark Beeston–explains the history, makeup and
> organization of the Illuminati elite. - An untarnished view of the
beast
> that stalks the world.
> The Creature from Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin–Mindblowing and
> riveting.
> This book has ranged across 2,000 years of money and banking from
> Diocletian to the Rothschilds to Alan Greenspan—and tied it into
the New
> World Order.
> Freedomforceinternational.org site for G. Edward Griffins series:
> 'The Future is Calling'–a 4 part expose on the so called 'war on
terror'
> and the connections to the CFR and the deliberate engagement in war
for
> change.
> Bilderberg 2005 by Daniel Estulin (onlinejournal.com)–2 parts
> Mentioned earlier; a peek at the characters involved in the NWO and
their
> agenda.
> The Council on Foreign Relations and the New World Order by William
Blase
> Concise and information packed with the players and history of the
CFR.
> The Secret Shadow Government: A Structural Analysis by Richard J.
Boylan,
> PhD.
> - A guide to the elite NWO players and groups who operate behind the
> official façade.
> The American Turkish Council: US association helps create the NWO.
> (onlinejournal.com) by John Stanton
> - NWO creation of New EuroAsia with the usual players involved;
highly
> informative.
> Neoliberalism and Empire
> Globalism and World Order: The Institutionalization of Injustice by
> Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed (mediamonitors.net)
> Excellent overview of the predatory and destructive practices and
results
> of the IMF, WB, WTO, GATT etc. that have been and are being used to
> destroy the sovereignty of nations as they plunder their resources
and
> place millions into poverty.
> A Short History of Neoliberalism by Susan George
> "To allow the market mechanism to be sole director of the fate of
human
> beings and their natural environment . . . would result in the
demolition
> of society"; sums up Neoliberalism.
> World Bank, WTO and Corporate Control over Water by Vandana Shiva
> Indian activist working to preserve seeds, water resources against
> predators like Monsanto and Coca-cola–describes the worlds struggles
> against Neoliberalism.
> Media
> Manufacturing Consent: A Propaganda Model (thirdworldtraveler.com)
> By Noam Chomsky–excellent overview by the master on democracy and
> propaganda.
> What makes Mainstream Media Mainstream? (zmag.org)
> By Noam Chomsky–an essay on how MSM media works.
> Secret Admirers: The Bushes and the Washington Post
(onlinejournal.com)
> two parts.
> By Michael Hasty–A look at the Bush dynasty and their propaganda
machine;
> for more on the media and the CIA google to 'Mockingbird–subversion
of
> the free press.'
> Paranoid Shift (onlinejournal.com) by Michael Hasty (also see other
> articles by MH)
> Fascism, the Bushes, conspiracies and the media. . . .
> Monopoly Media Manipulation (michaelparenti.org) by Michael Parenti
> Leading political scientist and activist sheds light on media
> manipulation of public opinion: suppression by omission, framing and
> other techniques of deception.
> Fascism and 9/11
> Now and Then (rense.com) - Hitler, Bush II and totalitarian
corporatism .
> . .
> George W. Bush–Terrorist in the White House: War for Israel
(nogw.com)
> A who's who of the Neocon/Zionist/Illuminati Bush cabal . . . links
and
> with updates
> 9/11 and The American Empire (scoop.co.nz) - David Ray Griffin's
> historical talk at the University of Wisconsin on Apr. 18, 2005 on
the
> evidence that implicates the leaders of the USG in the events of
9/11.
> Internet Sites
> Whatreallyhappened.com–collection from wide alternative and MSM
sources
> Rense.com–collection from wide alternative and MSM sources
> Onlinejournal.com–Penetrating and cutting edge alternative news and
> research
> Educate-yourself.com–good source for NWO and alternative articles–a
must
> read is Tavistock: the Best Kept Secret in America by Dr Byron T.
Weeks,
> MD on mind control.
> Davidicke.com–NWO author who dubbed Problem, Reaction and Solution
> method.
> Joelskousen.com–Excellent must read Strategic Threats and How to
Analyze
> the News
> Savethemales.ca Henry Makow's NWO site is fascinating and piercing.
> Gregpalast.com–hard hitting investigative sleuth on the stolen
American
> elections and the current anti IMF/WB Latin American movements.
Sharp.
> The Money Changers–google to Patrick S J Carmack's book on
international
> bankers, the Rothschilds money monopoly and the creation of debt.
> Threeworldwars.com -NWO site with toolbars and links to critical
> information on NWO.
> Truedemocracy.net–Go to Magazine and Fall 2003 issue for NWO–other
> articles
> Globalresearch.ca -Michel Chossudovsky's highly informative eclectic
> international site
> Counterpunch.com–Michael St. Clair and Alexander Cockburn muckraking
> site.
> Solari.com–Catherine Austin Fitts site - information and
alternatives to
> the tapeworm
> Books
> A Peoples History of the United States–Howard Zinn–omits the Federal
> Reserve, Inc. scam but is still more honest than the Rockefeller
> Foundation versions.
> I hope this article and resource list is helpful to you and I do
believe
> it is possible to build a better world when we have the information,
> knowledge and the love to do it.
> Disclaimer: This article is offered in the spirit of free speech
and is
> for informational and educational purposes only.
>
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/062905Friedman/062905friedman.
htm
> l
>
> Download pdf file:
> http://www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/062905Friedman/06-29-
05_Friedman.
> pdf
> ==========================================
> From: Skews Me skews_me@y...
> Sedition Act of 1798 coming soon to a nation near you
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia_tradecraft/links/Sedition_Act_of_179
8_0
> 01118008922/
> Links > Sedition Act of 1798
>
> - Section 1
> Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United
> States of America, in Congress assembled, That if any persons shall
> unlawfully combine or conspire together, with intent to oppose any
> measure or measures of the government of the United States, which
are or
> shall be directed by proper authority, or to impede the operation
of any
> law of the United States, or to intimidate or prevent any person
holding
> a place or office in or under the government of the United States,
from
> undertaking, performing or executing his trust or duty, and if any
person
> or persons, with intent as aforesaid, shall counsel, advise or
attempt to
> procure any insurrection, riot, unlawful assembly, or combination,
> whether such conspiracy, threatening, counsel, advice, or attempt
shall
> have the proposed effect or not, he or they shall be deemed guilty
of a
> high misdemeanor, and on conviction, before any court of the United
> States having jurisdiction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not
> exceeding five thousand dollars, and by imprisonment during a term
not
> less than six months nor exceeding five years; and further, at the
> discretion of the court may be ho]den to find sureties for his good
> behaviour in such sum, and for such time, as the said court may
direct.
> http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/statutes/sedact.htm skews_me
> Edit Delete Cut
> - Section 2
> And be it farther enacted, That if any person shall write, print,
utter.
> Or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written, printed,
uttered or
> published, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid in
writing,
> printing, uttering or publishing any false, scandalous and malicious
> writing or writings against the government of the United States, or
> either house of the Congress of the United States, or the President
of
> the United States, with intent to defame the said government, or
either
> house of the said Congress, or the said President, or to bring
them. or
> either of them, into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against
them, or
> either or any of them, the hatred of the good people of the United
> States, or to excite any unlawful combinations therein, for
opposing or
> resisting any law of the United States, or any act of the President
of
> the United States, done in pursuance of any such law, or of the
powers in
> him vested by the constitution of the United States, or to resist,
> oppose, or defeat any such law or act, or to aid, encourage or abet
any
> hostile designs of any foreign nation against the United States,
their
> people or government, then such person, being thereof convicted
before
> any court of the United States having jurisdiction thereof, shall be
> punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, and by
> imprisonment not exceeding two years.
> http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/statutes/sedact.htm skews_me
> Edit Delete Cut
> - Section 3
> And be it further enacted and declared, That if any person shall be
> prosecuted under this act, for the writing or publishing any libel
> aforesaid, it shall be lawful for the defendant, upon the trial of
the
> cause, to give in evidence in his defence, the truth of the matter
> contained in the publication charged as a libel. And the jury who
shall
> try the cause, shall have a right to determine the law and the fact,
> under the direction of the court, as in other cases.
> http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/statutes/sedact.htm skews_me
> Edit Delete Cut
> - Section 4
> And be it further enacted, That this act shall continue and be in
force
> until the third day of March, one thousand eight hundred and one,
and no
> longer: Provided, that the expiration of the act shall not prevent
or
> defeat a prosecution and punishment of any offence against the law,
> during the time it shall be in force. -- 14 July 1798
> http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/statutes/sedact.htm skews_me
> Edit Delete Cut
> Thomas Jefferson
> Jefferson's next move was made with a stealth worthy of a secret
agent.
> There was no hope of repealing the Sedition Act in Congress or of
seeking
> protection in the solidly Federalist courts. [His compatriots] had
to
> fall back to their last line of defense -- the states.
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia_tradecraft/message/1141
>
>
> For more information, visit
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia_tradecraft/
>
> ==========================================
>
> THE FOLLOWING WAS POSTED BEFORE THE SENATE OKed THE HORRIBLE CAFTA:
> HERE COMES one of the TEN WORLD ZONES--GOODBYE USA!
>
> Senate approves CAFTA
>
> http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-06-30-senate-
cafta_x.htm?csp
> =24&RM_Exclude=Juno
>
> Posted 6/30/2005
>
> Senate approves trade agreement with six Latin American countries
>
> =====
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Executive Editor Desk
> To: Pat Rydz
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 10:47 AM
> Subject: Re: Codex - OK, now is the time to fight it. We don't have
much
> time.
>
>
> Thank you for your email. I work with the "traitors" who are going
to
> jail.
> Good manner forbids from saying what I really think....the most
polite
> response I can think of is that you are an ignorant jerk.
> Diane Ceribelli
>
>
> At 10:17 AM 6/29/2005, you wrote:
>
> (of course, you didn't see this in hte news today, did you???) NO,
since
> we have consistantly won this battle nationally, they are getting
around
> it internationally and the drug companies win. The papers are
useless.
> But the good news is, they are getting theirs finally with those
> reporters going to jail. Good for us that they also get to pay.
>
> They are traitors (the press) who are assisting in attacking our
health
> and are now a threat to our lives. That changes things where they
were
> before just minions spewing the party line, they are now
collaborators
> and our enemies. Dont forget that. Every single one of them.)
Here is
> an email I got on what is going on. Thank God someone is watching
all
> this. The Press sure is missing in Action.
>
> "I just called the Senate Finance Committee office in Washington DC
and
> its
> very important we intensify our opposition to CAFTA due to the
> harmonization
> language it contains which forces harmonization of our dietary
supplement
> laws to restrictive Codex standards.
>
> All they did today was they had opening remarks- then they
adjourned.
> Tomorrow will be the bigger day, so there is still time for us to
lob in
> our
> 2 cents worth.
>
> Please take the following actions and urge everyone you know
to "pile
> on"-
> we need to hear the sounds of bones breaking on this one folks
cause its
> EAT
> or be EATEN &its way better to be PISSED OFF than to be PISSED ON,
so
> speak
> up NOW while you still have the CHANCE to be heard because these
PAC $$
> addicted Senators need to be reminded that we even EXIST out here:
>
> WHAT TO TELL 'EM WHEN YOU CALL:
>
> This is a recommended statement to use in calling your congressmen
and
> senators. They
>
> are going to include taking our vitamins away in the
>
> CAFTA treaty.
>
> Please call, we only have one day to do this. They are voting on it
> tomorrow. Sorry, but PLEASE CALL.
>
> Here is the language and below is the phone numbers, otherwise we
have
> just lost our vitamins, supplements and herbal remedies.:
>
> The Constitution clearly
> grants Congress alone the authority to regulate international
trade. The
> plain text of Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 is incontrovertible.
>
> Neither Congress nor the President can give this authority away by
> treaty,
> any more than they can repeal the First Amendment by treaty. This
> fundamental point, based on the plain meaning of the Constitution,
cannot
> be
> overstated. Every member of Congress who votes for CAFTA is voting
to
> abdicate power to an international body in direct violation of the
> Constitution.
>
> Unless you vote AGAINST CAFTA and also oppose FTAA with every fiber
of
> your
> being, you can rest assured I will oppose your political career as
long
> as
> there is a breath left in my body, because if you vote for CAFTA, I
will
> consider you to be threatening MY LIFE!!!" (TOO LATE FOR THIS, the
SENATE
> HAS ALREADY VOTED FOR THE HORRIBLE CAFTA!--"Cheyenne Cin")
>
> WHO TO CALL TO TELL THIS TO:
> (Call the Capital Switchboard # 202-225-3121 and ask to be
connected to
> each
> of these people, and after you're done talking with each one ask to
be
> reconnected to the switchboard so you can be connected to the next
one):
>
> REPUBLICANS:
>
> Charles Grassley, IA
> Orrin Hatch, UT
> Trentt Lott, MS
> Olympia Snowe, ME
> Jon Kyl, AZ
> Craig Thomas, WY
> Rick Santorum, PA
> Bill Frist, TN
> Gordon Smith, OR
> Jim Bunning, KY
> Mike Crapo, (pronounced "CRAY-PO") ID
>
> DEMOCRATS
> Max Baucus, MT
> John D. Rockefeller,IV, WV
> Kent Conrad, ND
> Jeff Bingaman, NM
> John Kerry, MA
> Blanche Lincoln, AR
> Ron Wyden, OR
> Charles Schumer, NY
>
> ALSO- Keep sending in this form letter where you can also add your
own
> comments
> http://capwiz.com/lef/mail/oneclick_compose/?alertid=7739691
>
> SNOWBALL THIS ALERT- IF CAFTA MAKES IT OUT OF COMMITTEE TOMORROW
> (WEDNESDAY
> JUNE 29th) they're going to bring it to the Floor of the Senate on
> FRIDAY,
> then it goes before the House Ways and Means Committee and to the
Floor
> of
> the House after the week long July 4th recess)
> ================================================
> From: "tHe mAdd pRoFeSsOr" madd_professor@c... and parts from
> "Cheyenne Cin"
> Uh huh, things are moving along wouldn't you say? Methinks the
signs are
> pointing to the showdown to begin? .
>
> SInce ole John the Baptist (Who Christ said was in the Spirit of
Elijah)
> got beheaded, it is not to illogical to assume the Christians (two
many
> membered body of witnesses) that they get beheaded too, being they
are in
> the Spirit of Elijah too. These will be the ones left behind after
the
> Rapture who become Christians then.
>
> Keep the faith though whatever comes! Better yet, accept Jesus as
God,
> Lord and Savior NOW, so you will go out at the Rapture.
>
> Actual Bill from Guillotine article you sent me June 9, 2002!
>
>
>
> Georgia House of Representatives - 1995/1996 Sessions
> HB 1274 - Death penalty; guillotine provisions
> Page Numbers - 1/ 2
> Code Sections - 17-10-38/ 17-10-44
> Prev Bill Next Bill Bill Summary Bill List Disclaimer
>
> 1. Teper 61st
>
> House Comm: SJudy / Senate
Comm: /
>
> House Vote: Yeas Nays Senate Vote: Yeas
Nays
>
> ----------------------------------------

>
> House Action
Senate
>
> ----------------------------------------

>
> 1/12/96 Read 1st
Time
>
> 1/22/96 Read 2nd
Time
>
> ----------------------------------------

>
>

>
> Code Sections
amended:
>
>
>
> HB 1274 LC 21 3643
>
>
>
>
>
>
> A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
> AN ACT
>
>
> 1- 1 To amend Article 2 of Chapter 10 of Title 17 of the Official
> 1- 2 Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to the death penalty
> 1- 3 generally, so as to provide a statement of legislative
> 1- 4 policy; to provide for death by guillotine; to provide for
> 1- 5 applicability; to repeal conflicting laws; and for other
> 1- 6 purposes.
>
> 1- 7 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF GEORGIA:
>
> SECTION 1.
>
> 1- 8 The General Assembly finds that while prisoners condemned to
> 1- 9 death may wish to donate one or more of their organs for
> 1-10 transplant, any such desire is thwarted by the fact that
> 1-11 electrocution makes all such organs unsuitable for
> 1-12 transplant. The intent of the General Assembly in enacting
> 1-13 this legislation is to provide for a method of execution
> 1-14 which is compatible with the donation of organs by a
> 1-15 condemned prisoner.
>
> SECTION 2.
>
> 1-16 Article 2 of Chapter 10 of Title 17 of the Official Code of
> 1-17 Georgia Annotated, relating to the death penalty generally,
> 1-18 is amended by striking in its entirety Code Section
> 1-19 17-10-38, relating to death sentences generally, and
> 1-20 inserting in lieu thereof the following:
>
> 1-21 "17-10-38. (Index)
>
> 1-22 (a) All persons who have been convicted of a capital
> 1-23 offense and have had imposed upon them a sentence of death
> 1-24 shall, at the election of the condemned, suffer such
> 1-25 punishment either by electrocution or by guillotine. If
> 1-26 the condemned fails to make an election by the thirtieth
> 1-27 day preceding the date scheduled for execution, punishment
> 1-28 shall be by electrocution.
>
> 1-29 (b) In all cases in which the defendant is sentenced to be
> 1-30 electrocuted executed, it shall be the duty of the trial
> 1-31 judge in passing sentence to direct that the defendant be
>
>
> -1- (Index)
>
> LC 21 3643
>
> 2- 1 delivered to the Department of Corrections for
> 2- 2 electrocution execution at a state correctional
> 2- 3 institution designated by the department."
>
> SECTION 3.
>
> 2- 4 Said article is further amended by striking in its entirety
> 2- 5 Code Section 17-10-44, relating to death chamber apparatus
> 2- 6 and related matters, and inserting in lieu thereof the
> 2- 7 following:
>
> 2- 8 "17-10-44. (Index)
>
> 2- 9 The Department of Corrections shall provide a death
> 2-10 chamber and all necessary apparatus, machinery, and
> 2-11 appliances for inflicting the penalty of death by
> 2-12 electrocution or by guillotine."
>
> SECTION 4.
>
> 2-13 This Act shall be applicable to all executions occurring on
> 2-14 or after August 31, 1996.
>
> SECTION 5.
>
> 2-15 All laws and parts of laws in conflict with this Act are
> 2-16 repealed.
>
>
>
>
>
> -2- (Index)
>
> Office of the Clerk of the House
> Robert E. Rivers, Jr., Clerk of the House
> Last Updated on 01/02/97
>
> ==================================