Sign In
New User? Sign Up
LPFM_Radio · New Zealand LPFM Radio Broadcasting
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!7

Yahoo!7 Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can set the sort order of messages. Just click on the link in the date column. Your preferences will be remembered, so you don't have to do it again when you return.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re: [LPFM] The new frequencies   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1214 of 6151 |
Re: [LPFM] The new frequencies

Andrew Dyke wrote:
We have seen examples where a single operator is saturating an entire area using most of the band by linking in-band and having multiple transmitters.
This I understand.  But surely a ruling that specifies one transmitter only allowed in the guardband would be sufficient.  I use 2 but would be much happier using 1 than none at all.  My hope was that a ruling like this would not come into effect until an atternative higher power non-commercial LPFM was available.

Many New Zealand citizens will suffer from this ruling. I'm talking about the listeners, not the operators.  The alternative music that Tauranga has had now for 3 years will be sadly missed based on the amount of positive feedback I have received.  A lot of my listeners are elderly and regard it as an alternative to the National Station.  A home & hospital for the elderly informed me that they have my station available on a pipe to all patients as they find it uplifting.


Ross Levis.
Soul FM
 
Perhaps I am feeling a bit smug because I live on top of a hill in Wellington and can see the Hutt valley, the airport, Kapiti and the city, and if I put up a 1/2 watt signal it could be recieved by just about everybody in Wellington!  Mind you, if you had to put up with the wind that I do you might consider that living in a gully has its good points too and I doubt if I could keep a decent antenna on the roof for more than a few months!
 
When the notice is posted, it will be at www.govt.med.nz/rsm/whatsnew  for a month or so.  After that you will need to dig for it in the "Licensing" pages.  As far as I am aware, there is no intention to change the text from what I put up during the week as it is considered to meet the wishes of most users.  I have been passing on comments from the group to our policy section where appropriate.  I can assure you that some of them have sparked lively debate!
 
Cheers
Andrew
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [LPFM] The new frequencies

Please forgive me as my remarks were not aimed at people on this list who like myself are providing a service that is otherwise unavailable I am more concerned with the likes of rhema who have taken large chunks of lpfm spectrum around the country which could better be used by people again like ourselves who do it localy for our local communities.
As for my own position well I guess I am fortunate in that I live in an relitively flat ie valley area sourounded on 3 sides by high hills were there is little other fm broadcasts (more fm from wellington sometimes).
MBD
----- Original Message -----
From: Ross Levis
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: [LPFM] The new frequencies

If this comes into force then I'll not be sweeting so much as sad for all my listeners when I pull the plug on the only alternative (to mainstream) music in the city.  If my transmission was forced to move to the studio here at home in this small gully then I may as well put a loud speaker on the roof as I would get as many listeners that way.

By moving my main transmission 900 metres up to a ridge via a non-guardband frequency, the station covers most of the city.  I also put a repeater at Mount Maunganui where the Tauranga signal cannot be heard very well.  I don't see how this breaches the spirit of LPFM.  Two transmissions on the guardband in 2 local areas.  Perhaps MBD, you live in a reasonably flat or elevated position so you have a reasonable coverage area from where you are.

This decision may also make it illegal to tap into someone elses feed for a couple of hours for a specialty show via an Internet stream, such as what is happening now by a couple of LPFMers way across the country.  Not to mention the end of the news feed that is being discussed.

Ross.

M.B & J.D Duffy wrote:
Hi group well I guess some might be sweating a bit right now especially those lpfm operators who in my opinion (and it is only an opinion) breach the spirit of lpfm by running networks and multiple tx's either in the same town, city or further afield.
Does clause 2.2 of the new regs read that networking or linking are now banned.
If this is true I say about time as it will restore what lpfm should be used for and also free up much needed freq. being used by people (not just rhema) that want to use the lpfm band for commercial or semi commercial aplications.
MBD

---------------------------------------------------------
LPFM Website: http://au.groups.yahoo.com/group/LPFM_Radio

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
LPFM_Radio-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------------------------------
LPFM Website: http://au.groups.yahoo.com/group/LPFM_Radio

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
LPFM_Radio-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------------------------------
LPFM Website: http://au.groups.yahoo.com/group/LPFM_Radio

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
LPFM_Radio-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------------------------------
LPFM Website: http://au.groups.yahoo.com/group/LPFM_Radio

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
LPFM_Radio-unsubscribe@...



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



Sun May 4, 2003 12:05 am

rosslevis
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1214 of 6151 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Thanks Andrew... Is there any sign of input breing requested by MED at any time, and if unlikely, who do we lobby... Chris Diack. ... From: Andrew Dyke To:...
Chris Diack - Concert...
diack@...
Send Email
Apr 30, 2003
12:31 pm

Hi group well I guess some might be sweating a bit right now especially those lpfm operators who in my opinion (and it is only an opinion) breach the spirit of...
M.B & J.D Duffy
DuffyFamily@...
Send Email
Apr 30, 2003
10:13 pm

Andrew Dyke wrote: New rules regarding remote transmitters (not allowed) Are you saying no studio-to-transmitter links will be allowed?. So those living in...
Ross Levis
rosslevis
Offline Send Email
Apr 30, 2003
11:16 pm

I guess everyone's view is different on this one. The government are currently holding up commercial licesening to provide 'non-profit' bandwidth in the new...
Gavin & Cass
kiwi_rock@...
Send Email
May 1, 2003
7:16 am

If this comes into force then I'll not be sweeting so much as sad for all my listeners when I pull the plug on the only alternative (to mainstream) music in...
Ross Levis
rosslevis
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2003
9:25 am

Please forgive me as my remarks were not aimed at people on this list who like myself are providing a service that is otherwise unavailable I am more concerned...
M.B & J.D Duffy
DuffyFamily@...
Send Email
May 1, 2003
8:31 pm

You would think Rhema was at least semi commercial-they are up with the "big ones" with their corporate style advertising-they should bid in auctions like TRN...
Michael and Ross
alnairgrus
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2003
10:54 pm

Rhema do bid for high power frequencies just lke everyone else. They won a frequency in Tauranga in an auction many years ago. They have since sold it. I think...
Ross Levis
rosslevis
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2003
12:07 am

Cool to see Graham subscribed, I was chatting with him the other day and suggested he join to get all the goss first! Jonathan Mosen Director ACB Radio, the...
Jonathan Mosen
jonathan@...
Send Email
May 2, 2003
12:29 am

Hi Chris No timetable at this stage for the upper band. I would expect a discussion paper will be posted on the MED website when it comes up. Cheers Andrew ...
Andrew Dyke
andrew_dyke10
Offline Send Email
May 3, 2003
10:34 am

Hi guys The ban on linking is an absolute one. I understand that this will be a problem for people living in gullies and less than ideal transmission spots...
Andrew Dyke
andrew_dyke10
Offline Send Email
May 3, 2003
10:34 am

Hi Andrew Does this "in-band" linking mean: where one transmitter ( say on 107.00 ) is used in one area of a city, recieved at another part of the city and...
SOUNDWAVE FM - Hawke'...
kiwi-radio
Offline Send Email
May 3, 2003
5:19 pm

Hi Group, For this to happen wouldn't the clause 2.2 have to be amended for it reads that the tramitter has to be within 100 mtrs of the studio. MBD ... From:...
M.B & J.D Duffy
DuffyFamily@...
Send Email
May 3, 2003
8:22 pm

May I ask what document are you refering to? Regards, Ross. M.B & J.D Duffy wrote: Hi Group, For this to happen wouldn't the clause 2.2 have to be amended for...
Ross Levis
rosslevis
Offline Send Email
May 3, 2003
11:38 pm

Andrew Dyke wrote: We have seen examples where a single operator is saturating an entire area using most of the band by linking in-band and having multiple...
Ross Levis
rosslevis
Offline Send Email
May 4, 2003
12:04 am

Perhaps "they" should release 1611kHz to 1701 for "LPAM" too as its not used in NZ? Michael Ross Levis <ross@...> wrote:Andrew Dyke wrote: We...
Michael and Ross
alnairgrus
Offline Send Email
May 4, 2003
5:04 am

Hmmm, I know of an operator using 2 transmitters from the same location transmitting the same programme. One is on a tep spectrum license the other is 88.2 Is...
Teresa & Rob
ninetyninefm
Offline Send Email
May 4, 2003
2:25 am

Hiagain, In my opinion this practice should be stopped as well. 2 txs broadcasting the same porgramme from the same source is questionable. The only advantage...
M.B & J.D Duffy
DuffyFamily@...
Send Email
May 4, 2003
4:24 am

That's identical to Blowhole FM here on 88.1. They are using it as a link a few hundred metres across town to a 80 watt commercial licence at the Polytech. I...
Ross Levis
rosslevis
Offline Send Email
May 4, 2003
4:27 am

There is another purpose which is still abuse in my opinion. There are a few jap radios without band expanders around. Ross. M.B & J.D Duffy wrote: Hiagain, In...
Ross Levis
rosslevis
Offline Send Email
May 4, 2003
4:29 am

I don't think many AM receivers go that high. Perhaps some old analogue tuners but the digital ones don't. About 25 years ago I did some illegal LPAM on 1650,...
Ross Levis
rosslevis
Offline Send Email
May 4, 2003
5:11 am

Greetings Ross and all. Our station broadcasts with 2.5 kw on 1602 kHz... and particularly those "AM sets manufactured in the past decade cover out to 1700...
Allen Little
ajl@...
Send Email
May 4, 2003
6:49 am

Hi Graham No, that is not in-band linking. We would call that "off-air" linking. In-band linking is where the program is broadcast on two frequencies at two...
Andrew Dyke
andrew_dyke10
Offline Send Email
May 4, 2003
7:38 am

Hi Ross This would be exactly what is NOT wanted. If the Polytech need to run an STL(studio-trransmiter link) they should get a fixed service licence and do...
Andrew Dyke
andrew_dyke10
Offline Send Email
May 4, 2003
7:48 am

Graham Brown we're talking about? Nice to see u also in this room to. Gavin, Radio Clutha. ... From: Ross Levis To: LPFM_Radio@... Sent: Friday,...
Gavin & Cass
kiwi_rock@...
Send Email
May 5, 2003
1:12 am

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Australia & NZ Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help