Ross.
Teresa & Rob wrote:
Hmmm, I know of an operator using 2 transmitters from the same location transmitting the same programme. One is on a tep spectrum license the other is 88.2Is this called linking?----- Original Message -----From: Andrew DykeTo: LPFM_Radio@...Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2003 10:27 PMSubject: Re: [LPFM] The new frequencies
Hi guysThe ban on linking is an absolute one. I understand that this will be a problem for people living in gullies and less than ideal transmission spots but laws have to be enforceable and if a loophole is left it will be exploited by the less sincere operators. There is no way of putting a "good intentions" provision into rules like these. The concern that the MED has is that a high vantage point is being used by some semi-commercial operators which is blocking the use of this service by the people that it is intended for. We have seen examples where a single operator is saturating an entire area using most of the band by linking in-band and having multiple transmitters.Perhaps I am feeling a bit smug because I live on top of a hill in Wellington and can see the Hutt valley, the airport, Kapiti and the city, and if I put up a 1/2 watt signal it could be recieved by just about everybody in Wellington! Mind you, if you had to put up with the wind that I do you might consider that living in a gully has its good points too and I doubt if I could keep a decent antenna on the roof for more than a few months!When the notice is posted, it will be at www.govt.med.nz/rsm/whatsnew for a month or so. After that you will need to dig for it in the "Licensing" pages. As far as I am aware, there is no intention to change the text from what I put up during the week as it is considered to meet the wishes of most users. I have been passing on comments from the group to our policy section where appropriate. I can assure you that some of them have sparked lively debate!CheersAndrew----- Original Message -----From: M.B & J.D DuffyTo: LPFM_Radio@...Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 2:11 PMSubject: Re: [LPFM] The new frequencies
Please forgive me as my remarks were not aimed at people on this list who like myself are providing a service that is otherwise unavailable I am more concerned with the likes of rhema who have taken large chunks of lpfm spectrum around the country which could better be used by people again like ourselves who do it localy for our local communities.As for my own position well I guess I am fortunate in that I live in an relitively flat ie valley area sourounded on 3 sides by high hills were there is little other fm broadcasts (more fm from wellington sometimes).MBD----- Original Message -----From: Ross LevisTo: LPFM_Radio@...Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 9:25 PMSubject: Re: [LPFM] The new frequenciesIf this comes into force then I'll not be sweeting so much as sad for all my listeners when I pull the plug on the only alternative (to mainstream) music in the city. If my transmission was forced to move to the studio here at home in this small gully then I may as well put a loud speaker on the roof as I would get as many listeners that way.
By moving my main transmission 900 metres up to a ridge via a non-guardband frequency, the station covers most of the city. I also put a repeater at Mount Maunganui where the Tauranga signal cannot be heard very well. I don't see how this breaches the spirit of LPFM. Two transmissions on the guardband in 2 local areas. Perhaps MBD, you live in a reasonably flat or elevated position so you have a reasonable coverage area from where you are.
This decision may also make it illegal to tap into someone elses feed for a couple of hours for a specialty show via an Internet stream, such as what is happening now by a couple of LPFMers way across the country. Not to mention the end of the news feed that is being discussed.
Ross.
M.B & J.D Duffy wrote:
Hi group well I guess some might be sweating a bit right now especially those lpfm operators who in my opinion (and it is only an opinion) breach the spirit of lpfm by running networks and multiple tx's either in the same town, city or further afield.Does clause 2.2 of the new regs read that networking or linking are now banned.If this is true I say about time as it will restore what lpfm should be used for and also free up much needed freq. being used by people (not just rhema) that want to use the lpfm band for commercial or semi commercial aplications.MBD
---------------------------------------------------------
LPFM Website: http://au.groups.yahoo.com/group/LPFM_Radio
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
LPFM_Radio-unsubscribe@...
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------------------------------
LPFM Website: http://au.groups.yahoo.com/group/LPFM_Radio
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
LPFM_Radio-unsubscribe@...
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------------------------------
LPFM Website: http://au.groups.yahoo.com/group/LPFM_Radio
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
LPFM_Radio-unsubscribe@...
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------------------------------
LPFM Website: http://au.groups.yahoo.com/group/LPFM_Radio
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
LPFM_Radio-unsubscribe@...
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------------------------------
LPFM Website: http://au.groups.yahoo.com/group/LPFM_Radio
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
LPFM_Radio-unsubscribe@...
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.