On Nov 21, 2007 4:05 PM, Doug Haines <doha720@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> So less freeboard and narrrower. So faster, lighter but less buoyant.

Exactly. Also cheaper.
>
> Got some photos today.

Great. Look forward to seeing them.
regards,

Rob
>
>
> Ron Badley <badley@...> wrote:
>
>
> So sorry, not sure what made me think Rob was talking about windward
> hull. Type first, think later.
>
> RonB.
>
> On 19-Nov-07, at 7:13 PM, <mark@...> wrote:
>
> > That is leeward Ron.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > ...................................
> > Mark Stephens
> > www.harryproa.com
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: harryproa@...
> >> [mailto:harryproa@...] On Behalf Of Ron Badley
> >> Sent: Tuesday, 20 November 2007 2:12 PM
> >> To: harryproa@...
> >> Subject: Re: [harryproa] Solitarry Cruisability
> >>
> >>
> >> Hey Rob, I think Doug was interested in LW (leeward hulls).
> >>
> >> RonB.
> >>
> >> On 19-Nov-07, at 7:03 PM, Rob Denney wrote:
> >>
> >> > G'day,
> >> >
> >> > Substantial. Solitarry is much lower (1.2 in the middle, 0.6 at the
> >> > ends vs 2.1 and 1. Solitarry is 0.6 wide vs Vis 1m. Vis has an all
> >> > up weight of 4.7 tonnes, Solitarry 0.7.
> >> >
> >> > Solitarry will be much cheaper, much faster, much less spacious.
> >> >
> >> > regards,
> >> >
> >> > Rob
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Nov 20, 2007 10:53 AM, Doug Haines <doha720@...> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Rob,
> >> >>
> >> >> What 's the diffrence in LW hulls, Solitarry and Visionarry?
> >> >>
> >> >> DOug
> >> >>
> >> >> ________________________________
> >> >> Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Try it
> >> >> now.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Yahoo!7 Groups Links
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Try it now.
>