Sign In
New User? Sign Up
otmushrooms · Unpaid Mushrooms
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!7

Yahoo!7 Groups Tips

Did you know...
You can set the sort order of messages. Just click on the link in the date column. Your preferences will be remembered, so you don't have to do it again when you return.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
OpenTel and Swish Deeds may have been unlawful   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #547 of 578 |
Hi people,

In discussions with an insolvency practitioner this morning (Ken
Stout) I learned that a Deed must comply with Schedule 8A of the
Corporations Act.

Amongst other things, this refers to Sec. 556 and Reg. 5.3(A) point 06
clause 4 - which stipulates the priorities to which creditors must be
paid.

This is news to most of us, so I'm going to investigate this further.

If someone is willing to delve into the Corp Act files (on the Files
section of Yahoo Groups), they are still the old versions from 2002
... the question is: did this law exist when the non-compliant OT (or
Swish) Deed was drawn up?

Nick Bishop.
-----
I'm going home now, It's a fr3aking long trip to Vermont South :-(
-oOo-




Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:02 am

nick4mony
Offline Offline

Forward
Message #547 of 578 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hi people, In discussions with an insolvency practitioner this morning (Ken Stout) I learned that a Deed must comply with Schedule 8A of the Corporations Act. ...
nick4mony
Offline
Aug 23, 2007
10:02 am

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Australia & NZ Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help