Hi "deadlytoy" and Club.<br>Quite a password you
have chosen for yourself Marco, but warmly welcome to
this recreation home for us wounded on the
battlefields of the moq.org :-). No, really it has calmed down
lately - since the last upheaval at least - it looks
like people are becoming familiar with Internet
discussivons, they are just 4-6 years old and about to
mature.<br><br> By the way, I have at last found a way to relate
to the said sites: I'm subscribed, but uses the mail
filter to delete all posts and just look into the
archives and then respond to what I find interesting. I
find these YAHOO clubs pleasant and easy to navigate.
What about the moq.org. opening such a one instead of
the present mail-list type? Ask the steerers!
<br><br>Regarding the popularization question you are probably
right about Pirsig's force is his being no academic,
and my own opinion about university degree moqists..
well ... I had a message from one Anthony McWatt who
is working on a doctoral thesis about the MoQ and
who wanted to use parts of my "Quality Event", but
had got "red marks" from his consultant professor,
and asked for references and such. Well, that's the
name of the academical game :-) <br><br>Interesting
and true observations about translations and work in
general, the Norwegian ZAMM isn't good either ...and LILA
isn't translate at all.<br>Bo